As Barack Obama tours Israel and the Palestinian
territories, Turkish media has seized on Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s remarks during his concurrent visit to Denmark.
“Erdoğan clarifies his
comments on Zionism”, Milliyet reported yesterday, quoting comments the prime minister made to the Danish
daily Politiken. What he actually did was clarify his views on Israel and Palestine
– views that we already knew.
Politiken put it to Mr Erdoğan that his remarks last
month were understood by some to question the very legitimacy of Israel’s
existence and asked whether this was correct.
The prime minister responded, amply, with
Turkey’s official line: he is critical of Israeli policy and the current government,
not the state of Israel. He supports a two-state solution. He frequently
condemns anti-Semitism.
The crucial sentence is his final one: “In this context,
I stand behind my remarks in Vienna.”
So in his first public remarks on the matter since speaking at the UN
conference in February, the prime minister has offered neither an apology, nor
a withdrawal.
But does Mr Erdoğan truly believe Zionism is a crime
against humanity? In the humble opinion of this blog, no.
We stand behind the explanation of Mr Erdoğan's behaviour
we offered
in our post three weeks ago: that he was speaking off the cuff and was
hastily putting together a list of three. It was certainly offensive to bundle
Zionism into that list, and the prime minister has clearly failed to understand
that impact, but to suggest he truly believes it to be a crime against humanity
is a step too far.
This piece in Al-Monitor speculates Mr Erdoğan’s “softened” latest remarks were made to coincide with Mr
Obama’s Middle East visit, because the Turkish prime minister has fallen out of
grace in Washington as of late.
No comments:
Post a Comment