Among the offending tweets was one posted on 5 April 2012
that read: "This muezzin finished the evening call to prayer in 22
seconds. Prestissimmo con fuoco! What's the hurry? A woman? A rakı drinking table?" In other tweets he quoted preachings on the afterlife attributed to an 11th century Islamic theologian and commented: "is heaven a brothel?" Tashlik has a good summary (scroll down for English) of the tweets.
First, his sentencing exposed some of the bizarre
checks and moderations that can affect a prison sentence in Turkey. Guilty of "belittling the religious values assumed by a section
of the population", he was initially sentenced to eight months in prison. That was increased to twelve months because
the act took place on the Internet, a publishing organ, which in Turkish law
compounds the severity of any offence. It was then reduced by one-sixth to eight months because of Mr Say's good behaviour during the trial. It's as if the
judge was playing with a yo-yo.
Second, Mr Say's sentence was suspended, a relatively novel
concept in Turkey's criminal code, having only been introduced in 2006. For all
the criticism of the ruling AK Party for embracing this sentence - much of which is justified - it's important to remember that it is because of changes brought
under this government that convictions like these do not place the offender
behind bars. Think Orhan Pamuk or
Michael Dickinson,
both of whom faced prison for offending somebody, as examples of what could
have happened to Mr Say. He just has to be on his best behaviour for the next five years.
The third and most important point, however, is that Mr Say faced trial because he was handpicked by a political opponent. One of his complainants, an engineer called Ali Emre Bukağılı, has a history of being offended by atheists. He has filed cases against the likes of Richard Dawkins, whose website was briefly banned in Turkey some years ago. He praised yesterday's court ruling as "the right decision" and vowed to watch Mr Say's comments for the duration of his suspended sentence. There is clearly a vendetta there.
Fazıl Say's tweets were flippant, provocative and outspoken, just as he often is. Whether or not they were insulting is a subjective question; rather like making jokes about Catholic priests and young children, there are some who will find them funny and others downright offensive.
An excellent column in Hürriyet, referring to Mr Bukağılı by only his initials presumably in fear of legal repercussions, quotes him as saying he believes in freedom of expression, but only if it does not offend him personally. Speaking in 2011, he defended the practice of censoring criticism of religion by saying "other people have no need to read a book that offends me".
These are warped attitudes and everyone should be concerned about them. The trouble is that Turkish society's attitudes are going through a revolution and until its myriad components learn to better tolerate one another, cases like that of Fazıl Say will keep coming.
No comments:
Post a Comment